Tag: not a book

book adjacent, not a book, theatre

Not a Book: Into the Woods

veritywilde

It’s Easter Sunday and if you have a long weekend I hope that it is going well so far, and not too encumbered by the sort of weather that a Bank Holiday weekend in the UK always seems to cause. For the third weekend in a row I have a theatre related post for you and to be honest, I don’t think it’s the end of the run of show posts because I’ve seen a lot of shows in the last six weeks – including two this week alone. But this week I’m going with another Sondheim show to join my posts about Here We Are and the Frogs, Merrily We Roll Along and Old Friends.

Into The Woods is Stephen Sondheim’s take on some of Grimm’s Fairy Tales, intertwining them to tell the story of a childless baker and his wife who try to life a curse that has been placed on them by a witch but finding her a series of items in the woods. This brings them into contact with other story book characters. We’re taken through the story by a narrator. I can’t really tell you much more about the plot than that without giving too much away, but the story takes the familiar fairy tale tropes and plays with them. Sondheim’s music is often tricky to perform – there are difficult harmonies and tunes that don’t go where you expect. Into The Woods has got repeating motifs that evolve through the show – you’ll come out humming snatches rather than having an earworm of one tune stuck in your head. The lyrics are brilliant – clever and often witty and even the spoken lines have a rhythm to them.

In the Stephen Sondheim canon, Into the Woods comes after Sunday in the Park with George and is the second of his three collaborations with James Lapine and is at the tail end of his run of what was probably his best work. I had seen the movie of Into the Woods, but this is the first production that I’ve seen in person – the last time it was in London was 2010 when I wasn’t seeing as much theatre for various real world reasons. That production had Hannah Waddingham and Jenna Russell, this one has Jamie Parker and Kate Fleetwood. Now when I (first) went to see it Jamie Parker got injured midway through the first act* and was replaced by his understudy, and there were also understudies on for The Baker’s Wife and Little Red. But I enjoyed it so much that I went back this week to try and catch some of the people that I missed before they leave (more on that later) and to get a different view of the stage.

And as you can see – I was higher up and further back but straight on and that means I could see a lot more detail of the set and the action behind. If you’re going to see this then try and be as front on as you can – I think probably ideally a level down from this seat in Gallery 2 but those seats are pricey – so for the money this was excellent. And I did get to see all of Jamie Parker this time with the original Baker’s Wife Katie Brayben. There were still a few understudies on though – including Little Red again but also Jennifer Hepburn as the Witch. All the performances were excellent, but I can imagine that when it’s the full main cast it is really quite something because I definitely have preferences having seen it twice. I can really see why it earned 11 nominations at the Oliviers – as I said in my Producers review last week I’m expecting the winners to come from this and Paddington. That said I’m expected possibly more Paddington given that Paddington took the Whats On Stage awards – although they are voted for by the public and the Oliviers are voted by the industry so there maybe a difference there. I haven’t seen Paddington because tickets are like gold dust until the summer so I can’t judge, but this is truly brilliant.

In fact it’s been such a success that the run at the Bridge has extended until the end of May, having been originally due to end on April 20th. There is a cast change that comes with that though – the details of which were announced last week and is the reason why I hurried back this week to try and catch Parker and Brayben before they left. The replacements are pretty good too – Rachel Tucker, John Owen Jones and Melanie Le Barrie are all names in their own right, and Hughie O’Donnell is who I saw take over as the Baker mid-performance and he was very good too. Not going to lie, I am tempted to go back again..

Happy Easter if you’re celebrating, happy Sunday if you’re not!

Into the Woods is at the Bridge Theatre until May 30th

*if you know the show, he got injured somewhere in the sequence in the wood shed.

not a book, theatre

Not a Book: The Producers (again)!

veritywilde

Yes, yes, yes, I realise that this is the third time I have talked about The Producers here. Once when I saw it at the Menier in late 2024 and wrote a review, and then I reminded you of it when the transfer to the West End started last summer. But this week I went back again (third visit!) and I couldn’t resist.

So as previously mentioned, this is the first West End revival of Mel Brooks’s The Producers, the musical version of his classic movie that sees a Broadway producer and his accountant try to put on a surefire flop that they’ve oversold to investors so they can get rich. This revival has four Olivier nominations (the ceremony is in two week’s time) for Andy Nyman (Max Bialystock), Marc Antolin (Leo Bloom), Trevor Ashley (Roger De Bris) and Best Revival. I think it’s going to struggle to win any of them because it’s such a strong year and they’re up against Paddington and Into the Woods (which have been incredibly well reviewed and taking awards in the run up) but it really is an excellent production of a genius show.

Now I mentioned Andy Nyman there, and the reason that I went back to see the show again this week is because Andy is out of the show until mid-May because he’s doing a play in York, and he’s been replaced by Richard Kind. Now if you don’t recognise the name, you will recognise the face because Kind has been in so many things possibly most notably Only Murders in the Building, Curb Your Enthusiasm and the voice of Bing Bong in Inside Out. But he was also one of the replacement Maxes in the original Broadway production, and was also Max when the show played at the Hollywood Bowl and now he’s bringing it to London. And he’s wonderful. It was only his second night when I went (there was a gala performance on night three though) and he was brilliant and more impressively it already looked like he and Marc Antolin had been working together for months, despite the fact that he’s joining a very different production of a show he was last in more than a decade ago. Kind is 69 now, and he’s a tad slower around the stage than Nyman and had a couple of moments where the muscle memory of the old version seemed to kick in, but I’m pretty sure that will iron out – if it hasn’t already.

As you can see I was quite a long way back in the stalls, but that didn’t really matter because it’s not a show that has a lot of stuff happening high up and some how Kind manages to make the more subtle choices he makes reach the back of the room. If you haven’t seen the show already, you could make this your excuse and if you have it’s worth going to see the different version of Max that Kind is giving. I’ve had the tunes from the show stuck in my head all week – in fact some of them are so catchy that they started being earworms at the mere thought of seeing the show again!

The Producers is on at the Garrick Theatre and is booking until mid-September, Richard Kind is in it until May 9 with Andy Nyman returning on May 11. And if you want to see Nyman, there’s a code on the show’s website for some money off if you’re booking more than 8 weeks ahead…

Have a great Sunday everyone.

Exhibitions, not a book

Not a Book: Seurat and the Sea

veritywilde

Happy Mothering Sunday everyone, and I have been doing some more high culture to report back on today, with one of the first of the big London art exhibitions of the year and one which is very much in my area of interest.

Georges Seurat’s most famous paintings are Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte and Bathers at Asnieres. I’ve never seen the first which is in Chicago, but the second lives at the National Gallery and I will go and look at it every time I visit. In Washington back in 2018, I went to the National Gallery of Art where they have a selection of his works and wandered around that. So it’s no surprise that I would be very excited to go and see the first dedicated exhibition of his seascapes which is on at the Courtauld at the moment.

The Courtauld says this “major, focused display is the first devoted to Seurat in the UK in almost 30 years” which I can believe – because I don’t remember another one, and I have had my eye open for one since I first saw Sunday in the Park with George in the summer of 2006. This exhibition has 26 paintings, oil sketches and drawings that Seurat made during a series of summers he spent on the northern French coast between 1885 and 1890 before his early death at the age of 31 in 1891.

I find it really hard to write about art but there is something about the light and movement in Seurat’s works that always gets to me – and these seascapes are really something. They are arranged chronologically so that you can see the his technique and style developing of the the years, as well as seeing some of the studies alongside the major works that they were preparatory for. They have a sense of stillness and calm, despite the fact that they are seascapes. I spent some time standing on the far side of the gallery staring at them from a distance when they look almost like photographs and the effect he was aiming for with the pure colour is at it’s most effective. But up close the detail is incredible too.

The Courtauld also has other Seurats, including studies for la Grande Jatte and others in its regular collection along with other works by the impressionists, so if you’re interested in this period in art, this is well worth the entry fee. This was one of those occasions where I bought myself the exhibition poster and am now spending a stupid amount of money on the frame for it. And I’ve added to my postcard collection too, only to discover that I’ve got a mix of landscape and portrait postcards so I still don’t have enough to fill my big postcard display frame! Anway, if you want to go and see this, do your planning now because there are already some dates that are sold out. It’s already been extended so instead of ending in April it now ends in May and they have added late night opening on Fridays to cope with the demand.

I leave you with some Sunday in the Park with George, from the Sondheim Prom to mark his 80th birthday back in 2010. I’m bracing myself for the bunfight that will be ticket sales for next summer’s revival with Jonathan Bailey and Ariana Grande. Pray for me – and my wallet!

not a book, theatre

Not a Book: Hadestown

veritywilde

Another week, another theatre review, and given that the Hadestown cast is changing at the end of this week, I would have posted this last weekend, if it wasn’t for the fact that I think more people know about Hadestown than they do The Battle.

Hadestown tells a version of the story of the Ancient Greek myth of Orpheus and Eurydice, with the story transposed to an industrial factory version of the underworld, which Eurydice escapes to because of poverty and hunger. The show has a slightly complicated production history, which included a run at the National Theatre in London in 2018 before it went to Broadway and won the Tony for Best Musical Tony in 2019. It then returned to London in 2024 to take up residence at the Lyric Theatre on Shaftesbury Avenue, where it has proved tremendously popular and commanded ticket prices and availability to match.

This explains why I only just managed to go and see it – I go to a lot of shows and I have rules about how much I will spend. I did try for the period the other summer when the original Broadway cast came over here for a limited run ahead of a pro-shoot, but the fans were there quicker than me to the cheap seats, and so it took a good ticket offer before Christmas to get me there (and if I’d realised it was during the Winter Olympic Skating programme I would have picked a different date!) to see what all the fuss is about. I have a mixed record with Best Musical Tony Winners. I tend to prefer the Big and Fun when it comes to musicals and the Tony’s can sometimes go with the Not Big and Fun option. There are a few years when I look at the nominees and I am genuinely torn between which I like more (La Cage aux Folles vs Sunday in the Park With George in 1984, Avenue Q vs Wicked in 2004 – and I still wish I had had the chance to see Hugh Jackman in Boy from Oz) but in the main I am a commercial musical girl except when it comes to Sondheim.

All of which is to say that I can see why people love this (and I know several people who do) but it is not my thing. It is clever and it is well staged, but it is not a Verity Show. Our show was sold out – yes it was half term week, but there were also a few understudies on and it is clearly the sort of show that has a fan base who want to see as many different people in the roles as possible – because they have a loyalty card you can get stamped to get access to special merch. And I respect that, even as it makes me feel super old, because I would absolutely have been in the market for that for We Will Rock You back in the day. I would probably still have my special WWRY merch in a drawer the way I still have my Gaga t-shirt. So all in all very much a Nice To Tick Off The List for me more than anything else. I can confirm that my current count is 29 out of 76 best musicals (with another 3 if you count amateur productions), 22 out of 49 Best Musical Oliviers and I still have another seven (across the two lists some appear on both) that I could tick off if I pull my finger out and get to the long runners in the West End I still haven’t seen. Maybe 2026 is the year…

Have a Great Sunday!

not a book, theatre

Not a Book: The Battle

veritywilde

A bit of regional theatre for you this week, because for Valentine’s Day we headed to Birmingham to see a new play and it was a lot of fun with a dose of nostalgia attached.

The Battle is a play about the period in 1995 which could possibly be called Peak Britpop, where Oasis and Blur fought it out for the top spot in the singles charts. Britpop was a much larger movement than just these two bands, but the rivalry between them was fierce and really defined the era – Blur, southern and arty and Oasis, Mancunian and unfiltered. Some people will ahve it that you were either one side or the other, but there were plenty who liked both. Matthew Dunster, a former music industry A&R man, has written his first play imagining what was going on behind the scenes of the key moments that people might remember about the feud.

Anyway, this isn’t really a review, because we saw it a few days ahead of press night, and judging from the reviews a few things that we didn’t love may have changed, but is a recommendation because we had such a great time and laughed so hard so much of the time. There are some really good one liners here and some fabulous performances. The names in the cast are Matthew Horne (of Gavin and Stacey fame) as the boss of Blur’s record label, who is excellent whenever you see him but you sort of want more of him, and Louisa Lytton (Eastenders and the Bill) as Noel Gallagher’s girlfriend Meg Matthews, but I thought George Usher as Liam Gallagher (who is making his professional debut in the role) was the standout.

I’m trying not to think about the fact that the 90s are as long ago now as the 60s were back then. Because that is impossible and makes me feel a bit sick. When we saw it, the audience was wearing a lot of Oasis and Blur merch – and a report I saw on the TV earlier this week said that the bars at the theatre had reported near record sales so hopefully it’s doing well with the people who remember it when but I’m hoping it will also find an audience among people who don’t remember the original battle. And that’s because the 1990s seem to be back in fashion at the moment and going through a discovery moment for people who weren’t there at the time, which as someone who does remember particularly the second half of the decade is slightly traumatic.

Anyway, this is on at Birmingham Rep until the 7th March and then moves to Manchester Opera House for a week from 17 March. If you’re near enough by, I think it’s worth a trip.

Have a great Sunday everyone.

not a book, theatre

Not a Book: H M S Pinafore

veritywilde

Happy Sunday everyone! Today I’m talking about last week’s theatre trip, but it’s less a review than some thoughts, because this run of the show has now finished – although as it was a re-staging and got excellent reviews, hopefully it’ll be back again in a couple of years.

H M S Pinafore is a comic opera in two acts by Gilbert and Sullivan, and on its debut in 1878 was their first big international success. It tells the story of Captain Corcoran and his daughter Josephine – he wants to marry her off to the First Lord of the Admiralty, she wants to marry a (very) lowly sailor on her father’s ship. Hilarity ensues. And it really does, because this is directed by Cal McCrystal and its original production in 2021 was nominated for the Best Opera Olivier. I’ve popped the trailer in below, because although the footage is from that prior production, it is at least the same actor playing Captain Corcoran and the sets are the same too.

I have not watched a lot of opera, and I went to see this almost entirely because of Cal McCrystal. he directed Spymonkey‘s Cooped, which remains one of of the hardest times I’ve ever laughed, as well as One Man, Two Gu’vnors and the last opera that I saw – my first Gilbert and Sullivan – Iolanthe. And the two G&S productions have some things in common – namely lots of physical comedy, plenty of innuendo and some fun updating to make the references work as topical today (the way they did when it was first put on). This has also got Mel Giedroyc in it, playing two parts and breaking the fourth wall at every available opportunity.

I’m obviously not familiar enough with the original material to tell you exactly how much tinkering has been done, but I liked it and from what I could tell all the people around me did too, and my section seemed to include lots of G&S fans and amateur performers! The orchestra (conducted by Matthew Kofi Waldren) sounded incredible and the singing was beautiful. Add in some clever choreography, really well executed and a flock of enormous crinolines and I had a ball. My standout performer was John Savournin as Captain Corcoran – he’s a Gilbert and Sullivan specialist (I saw him in Iolanthe as well) who is clearly having a ball as he delivers the material absolutely beautifully. I would happily have gone back to see it again, and will be watching out for the next Gilbert and Sullivan production – having seen two done by McCrystal, I feel like I should see one that he’s not involved in for contrast if nothing else!

I leave you with a dash of Spymonkey, because this clip never fails to make me laugh. If it wasn’t the Winter Olympics, I’d be getting my Cooped DVD out to watch it again about now, but there’s figure skating tonight (Pairs short programme!) and I’ve got a lot of jobs to do first…

Happy Sunday!

not a book, streaming

Not a Book: America’s Team

veritywilde

While I am going to be deep in the Winter Olympic Figure Skating Team event this evening, it’s also the Super Bowl tonight, and as you know by now, I’m a bit of a NFL fan. But it’s lucky I’ve got the Olympics to distract me, because once again the Cowboys aren’t in it. It’s been a while now. I’m starting to lose patience, but what can you do they’re my team and you have to stand by them even when they’re playing terribly. But while the Vince Lombardi won’t be heading back to Dallas this year, I thought I’d write about Netflix’s documentary about the Cowboys and the team’s owner Jerry Jones.

The official title for this is America’s Team: The Gambler and His Cowboys, and that’s very much the tone of the doc – this is the story of Jerry’s Cowboys: how he bought them and what he did with them. And it’s quite the ride. Thirty plus years on from the start of the Jerry Jones era it’s easy to forget – or depending on your age not really appreciate what happened in Dallas in the decade from the mid-80s to the mid 90s. And this will give you that – the main focus of the bulk of the episodes is the building of the team that won three Super Bowls in four years and the stories and excesses around it.

The success of this is that its has managed to get pretty much everyone involved in the rise (and fall) who is still alive to take part. And that’s some feat given the feuds and the strong feelings that people have about it all. The Jerry Jones-Jimmy Johnson situation was quite something, for perspective it was only in 2023 that Johnson was inducted into the Cowboys Ring of Honor – nearly 20 years after the three key players of the Super Bowl winning teams that he coached. And they’re all pretty frank too. It’s very warts and all – not just with the backroom staff, but with players admitting their drug use and the special treatment they got from the police. So there’s plenty of salacious stuff in here for the casual view and fan.

The thing that really struck me was that it felt like while the massive success was happening, the players and the organisation didn’t really seem to think it would come to an end – like this is the Cowboys domination era and it will continue. And these things never go on forever in sports – whether it’s Manchester United in football or Ferrari or Red Bull in F1 you can’t stay on top forever no matter how hard you try. I also found it really interesting to help understand some of the decisions that the organisation (well Jerry!) has taken since. Even though the documentary glosses over the last thirty years quite a lot, if you’ve been following the team you can see Jerry trying to recreate the trades or the deals that brought them to that early 90s domination in the hopes that it will bring it back again.

And that explains why fans can get so exasperated with the Cowboys – it’s the most valuable sports franchise in the world according to Forbes (and has been since 2016) but it hasn’t won the SuperBowl or a Conference championship 1995. Jerry is the General Manager of the Cowboys as well as the owner – and that’s not a usual thing. But watching him in this, he’s supremely unbothered by what people think of him – he wants to do it his way or not at all.

This one is on Netflix – if you’re a sports fan it’s an interesting watch but if you’re a casual viewer and only going to watch one documentary about the Cowboys though, it should still be the first season of America’s Sweethearts!

comedy, not a book, streaming

Not a Book: I’m Chevy Chase, and You’re Not

veritywilde

Happy Sunday, it’s documentary o’clock again, and this is one that came out around New Year, so I’m even kind of topical for once. Check Me.

I’m Chevy Chase and You’re Not is a documentary film exploring the life and career of Chevy Chase. For those who are younger than me: Now in his 80s, Chevy Chase was the breakout star from the first season of Saturday Night Live in 1975 and left the show in its second season to go to Hollywood. In the 1980s he was in a string of box office hits – in Caddyshack, three National Lampoon’s Vacation movies and the one I remember being repeated on TV when I was a child: Three Amigos. But as the 90s progressed his movie career stalled out and he only really returned to prominence when he was cast in the sitcom Community in 2009, and then that ended badly. As you can see from the trailer, this has interviews with the man himself, his family, some of his costars and others who have worked with him behind the scenes and a few other famous talking heads.

Now the other thing that you need to know about him is that he’s got a bit of a reputation for being an “asshole”. I read Nick de Semylen’s Wild and Crazy Guys back in 2023 and he didn’t come over as particularly sympathetic in that. And he’s not helping himself out in some of the interviews that he does for this either. There are some glaring absences among the talking heads of people who have worked with him. So he’s not a massively sympathetic figure a lot of the time. But his childhood sounds grim and he’s been married to the same woman for more than 40 years and so that helps soften him a little. And he’s been ill recently – with time in a coma which has left him with some memory loss, which along with the coke addiction may mean that he’s not (always) lying when he says that he doesn’t remember doing or saying what others say he did or said.

This is directed by Marina Zenovich, who also made Lance about Lance Armstrong (which is really good) and Robin Williams: Come Inside my Mind (which I have on my to watch list) as well as other documentaries including two about Roman Polanski and another about Richard Prior. So she has plenty of experience with making films about comedians and it shows because the clips she’s picked of Chevy in his comedy prime are really good. If you weren’t around for his hey day (which I wasn’t) it’s easy to just dismiss him because of the stories about what a nightmare he can be. But he’s hard going when he’s not playing a character. He really is. Just read this New York Times interview he did with Zenovich to promote the documentary if you don’t believe me.

This is on Sky Documentaries and Now TV in the UK and on CNN in the US at the moment. It is due to appear on HBO Max at the end of January

Happy Sunday!

announcement, Book of the Week, books

No Book of the Week!

veritywilde

I’m sorry! Too much skating, not enough reading . I’ve got three things part finished but nothing to write about today so I’m giving myself a pass this week. In the meantime, here are some of my favourite performances from last week that might have gone under the radar if you only watched the final groups of the competition:

Josefin Taljegard from Sweden absolutely nailing her skate to It’s All Coming Back To Me Now, skating second in the women’s free programme (after the first person fell five times) and getting a standing ovation from the crowd for her performance, musicality and emotion. And we didn’t give many ovations.

We’ve had a lot of Moulin Rouge routines over the year but nothing quite like The Finns and their slightly unhinged but very entertaining take on it (that’s them in the picture at the top taking their bow).

And finally, my prediction for a potential viral moment at the Olympics: if Tomas Llorenc can land the triple axel at the start of this Minions programme for in Milan it will take the roof off.

Enjoy!

not a book, streaming

Not a Book: Death Cap

veritywilde

Happy Sunday everyone, I’m back with a documentary series for you this week, but just a warning to start with, it may make you wary of eating mushrooms for a while after you eat it!

Has there been a more notorious true crime case in the last five years than the case of the Mushroom Murders in Australia? I’ll wait. Erin Patterson invited four of her in-laws over for lunch and afterwards three of them died and the fourth nearly died. When the investigation started it discovered that the four victims had ingested death cap mushrooms. The story was soon being covered by international media outlets, and when the trial happened this summer there were multiple daily podcasts about the case as well as a huge amount of reporters from around the world covering the case.

This is a three part documentary which explores the investigation and trial and has the advantage of many true crime docs because of all the coverage that this case had. I’m not a big true crime person, but so many of the series that I have watched are reliant on reconstructions. This does not have that issue. There were journalists on the ground from the start, this was clearly in the process of being made during the trial and because it’s so recent the memories of the locals that are interviewed are fresh. It’s so fresh in fact that Erin Patterson’s appeal against her sentence (sorry, spoiler!) was only lodged in November.

For me, the most interesting part of this case was seeing and finding out more about the part of Australia where this happened. Leongatha has a population of less than 6,000. Morwell where the trial took place has around 15,000 residents. They’re both in the Gippsland area of Victoria, which basically looks like beautiful English countryside and not like the desert outback that you so often picture when you think of Australia. And the Paterson case turned the town upside down – firstly because everyone knows everyone there and secondly because of the huge attention it garnered. I watched all three episodes back to back one night in the run up to Christmas and could have watched another hour if there was one. All of which means that I suspect this won’t be the last content about this case I consume, even if I haven’t knowingly eaten mushrooms since!

If you want to watch this, it was made by the Australian streamer Stan and has been sold on to various different streamers in other parts of the world. The trailer I found on YouTube is for CNN and says it’s a CNN Original, but in the UK it’s on Netflix. So you may have to have a little hunt on your local streaming services to find out where this is in your territory.